Pierre Morisset gave me no preconditions. He said, “This is the report. Can you go through it? Can you find anything that you think is factually inaccurate? Can you find anything that we've missed? Can you add something that will help?” Basically, I was given a free hand to completely review the document.
I made one criticism. These reports follow on from each other, and there's a tendency, I feel, for people to review the previous reviews rather than go back to the original data. I made the comment that, personally, I thought that the review was a bit heavily reliant on the IOM study in the United States, but it's minor because I've got confidence in the IOM study, and I'm not really worried by that. But there's a tendency to do sequentially review each previous review rather than going back to the original data. But I'm completely happy with the report.