I only accept the one that says it is unlikely. That doesn't mean it is improbable.
I understand very well that, in 2013, the medical field doesn't know a lot about uranium poisoning. I would have liked to have seen this in the report, but it wasn't in there. There is still a lot of work to be done on this. The fact that it is unlikely gives me a lot of hope, especially since Dr. Morisset said in his testimony that he was going to work on a tool to better detect these things. In that respect, I'm asking myself this: if it isn't dangerous, why are we investing money in developing a detector?