That's good, because I was worried that when I tried to paraphrase her evidence I might get it wrong.
I'm sure you heard what she had to say about the inoculation she received when she was posted—the level of disclosure that was given to her with respect to those inoculations and the suggestion that some of the inoculations were experimental drugs. If you've reviewed that testimony, if I haven't fairly characterized it, rely on your review and not my summary of it.
I'm interested in your comments, given your field of expertise, on her testimony with respect to the inoculation she was given when posted and the level of disclosure that she was given with respect to those inoculations.