I'm happy that there was a study, because that didn't exist for the 10 years we did it. I'm not happy with the conclusions, because a lot of them are out of line with what is actually written in the study. I know they sent it out for peer review to three different people. But if you read very carefully, they sent out draft copies for peer review; they didn't send out a final copy. I know if my name was going on something, I'd want to see the final copy before I put my name on it. Little things like that raise red flags for me.
Am I happy with it? There are parts of it that apply, and then there are parts that are obviously cherry-picked.