Okay, thanks.
I appreciate that, because certainly among the group of peers that you would associate yourself with, through, I'm sure, international conferences and really trying to become experts on the topic, you would have come across this so-called 50% opposing viewpoint. So I do appreciate the fact that you're indicating that this isn't the case and it's quite likely a very small minority.
Do you have any idea, other than maybe the obvious reasons, why some veterans I'm sure in the U.S. and Canada are so focused on depleted uranium as being the cause?