Fortunately, I can do that off the top of my head. I've spent some time with Keith, Colleen, and some others on your VA staff in Canada, so I have a pretty good understanding. Our programs are very similar in the way we do things, although we've gone about the solutions to them slightly differently.
As you're very well aware, we pay for compensation for impact on ability to earn a living. Inside that is a very broad scope, a very broad spectrum.
Today we're sitting in a largely paper world. We have a current inventory of approximately 830,000 claims pending. We're completing them on average in about 265 days. Our secretary has laid out a goal for us that, by the end of our fiscal year 2015—which means September 30, 2015—we have to have the backlog, the number of those claims that are over 125 days, down to zero. We will improve our quality that we measure through our quality program from the current day of 89% to 98% by that same date.
In order to do that, we've determined that we need to take a two-pronged approach: to increase productivity, we're putting process changes in place; and to improve the quality part, we're relying in no small part on automation to take a lot of the variability out of the decision process.
On January 28 of this year we launched a system called VBMS, veterans benefits management system. This system was a couple of years in the development. It takes our entire paper-bound process and puts it into an automated system so that everything is done electronically. It's data-based as opposed to image-based. So we're not just collecting in the form of paper and looking at it as images on a screen; we're extracting data off the paper we collect as we scan it in, and we start processing this in a digital environment.
Depending on what office you look at, we're seeing anywhere from an increase in productivity of 15% to 20% on this first-generation system that was launched in January. Every three to six months there's a new release that introduces new capability, and it expands, so we take it across the entire spectrum of processing that we do.
We've started this in a few offices. We have 56 offices spread throughout the country and a couple of satellites on top of that. We started in a couple of offices, made sure that it worked, and expanded out, and three weeks from today we'll have every office in the country operating under this new system. This new system has been put in place using a point-forward concept, meaning the majority of those 830,000 claims we have in the system today are in the paper environment and will stay there until they're processed completely. However, point forward, every new claim that comes in is done in the electronic, paperless environment. That addresses the processing piece.
Let me give you a quick rundown on some of the other things we're doing. Very simply, going out and scanning all this paper doesn't do a whole lot for us. It's very expensive, it's time consuming, and it doesn't allow us to take the full benefit of the automation. This is going to very quickly reach over to Rob's world, where I'll stop.
We were up in Canada recently, over the winter, giving a demonstration of how to do an application online. Along with that comes some uploading. The bottom line here is that we put a front end in place that allows us to collect information in a digital environment; it's entered by the veteran, as opposed to collecting paper, scanning it in, and involving people.
We're still measuring the exact impact in terms of lift. Here's what we do know: the process we use in the electronic environment today, just the few claims that are coming in that way—there are only a few hundred because we haven't done a full national launch on this yet—are moving through our system in about 30 to 45 days as opposed to the 285-day average in the paper world that I was telling you about.
We think we have a system in place that's really going to change the way we do things. Now it's a question of how fast and how soon we can scale it up.
With that, I think the real benefit here would be some questions and answers from those of you sitting in the room, if you'd like to open the discussion.