As I was suggesting earlier, the decision was focused on offsets of Veterans Affairs Canada disability pensions paid under the Pension Act against the SISIP program. This is a program of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces, and it hinged on a very complex discussion of the provisions of that policy. It's an insurance policy, and that's why it was so complex.
As to the effect on Veterans Affairs Canada programming, the comments were fairly straightforward. As I understand it, and I stand to be corrected, I think what the Federal Court ruled when they looked at Veterans Affairs Canada's approach to the Pension Act was that the legislation is actually very clear in how it's worded. The rationale is very structured and the offset did not offend the legislation, and therefore it left open the question of what the government would do in respect of that.
In the end, the government simply made a decision that it would honour the spirit and intent of the decision and cease offsetting these benefits on the Veterans Affairs Canada side. That's essentially what led to the regulatory changes in the fall as they relate to earnings loss and Canadian Forces income support, and what has now led to the proposed legislative changes to the War Veterans Allowance Act and the Pension Act.