That's all I'll say on that because I don't want to spend a lot of time.
Getting back to the clawback, etc., as you can appreciate, my knowledge is very limited when it comes to the legal things that are happening. But I think the big thing should be whether the injury that person may have been suffering from for years and had never reported, or which has now come to a head, was caused because of his Korean War service.
I could go on for half an hour telling you things about people who were wounded, etc., and have things wrong with them and they have never even claimed it. I couldn't get a pension for my hearing loss until I had retired from the forces. They just wouldn't give it to me, and then all of a sudden they said, “yes, there is no question, your medical documents prove that.” But it hadn't been listened to before that. So I think we should listen and ask: is this attributable to wartime service? Is it unfair in relation to some of the clawbacks that may still be going on?
One thing I should mention again is kidney problems. A very astute doctor said that the only thing that could have caused that damage to your kidneys is rather poor treatment of your kidneys, which is a problem that only happens overseas.
I don't know if that answers your question or not.