Going back to Mr. Stoffer's first question about what the recommendations were, if you look back all the way through, you've had the Gerontological Advisory Council, the New Veterans Charter Advisory Group. You've had this committee. You've had the Senate subcommittee. You've had input from all the various recommendations and organizations of veterans, as well as other medical people. You've had the ombudsman. We've had lots of recommendations put forward for enactment.
Do we support a full review of the new Veterans Charter? Yes, we do.
As comrade Gord said in his preamble, we'd like a review every two years. But in essence, the whole charter should be reviewed continuously, to make sure that the services provided to the veterans are in fact being provided to the veterans.
The reason we have difficulty, and we go back to the first question of Mr. Stoffer, is that there are lots of recommendations on the table right now. They've been there for quite a while. In 2011, when Bill C-55 came in, there was no movement to make this a living charter. The charter has to live. It has to breathe and it has to evolve. The circumstances we're putting our men and women of the Canadian Forces and the RCMP in—but the RCMP is not covered here—around the world is evolving, and we need to evolve that support for them as well, as we put those people in those circumstances.