We weren't directly consulted on any of the changes, etc., but I think it's pretty clear from our presentation, our unanimous support around here in thinking about how the ombudsman's report did a pretty good job of outlining where the shortfalls are. There's no use in going back and saying what could have, should have, would have been done. We would say that we're pretty clear on hearing from our constituency that there needs to be changes made.
The charter was designed to be a living charter. It was designed to be reviewed. It was designed to be improved when there were shortfalls. Address them. It seems pretty simple to me.