Yes, I'm sorry, my French is not terrific, but I did understand the question.
My only comment would be that it is one thing to talk about a social covenant, it's another thing to implement the true meaning of a social covenant. If the minister wants to speak of believing in a social covenant, then we'd like to see some action with regard to the implementation of it. It's an academic exercise as to whether there is or is not a social covenant. It's very important to the foundation of all veterans legislation going back to World War I because it was used as a basis.
If you don't mind my expressing my concern in this area, if you start talking about “maybe it doesn't exist” or “maybe it shouldn't be enforceable”....Governments are faced with all sorts of competing interests, and there's a long list of people who come to your doors and ask for various things.
If veteran groups are just one of those and they have no priority in the system, then God forbid what will happen to the veterans community. There will be no priority assessed because it doesn't have a spot in the queue which it's had for 100 years. And if someone in the government is suggesting today that the veterans community has lost its spot in the queue, that's extremely troubling.