You can simply cut and paste to get the words, if I may suggest that—and not flippantly—the words are there.
I did not throw out the point that if you deploy the individual you deploy their families without considering its impact, remembering that historically we had the concept that if the army wanted you to have a family, they would have issued you with one, and that then we started to realize that it might be nice if the member were able to go home when his wife was having a baby so that they could share that experience together. That was a major thrust. We had people not liking it at all.
Now we have members who can have paternal leave, even. I'm still reeling under that one, but anyway....
The social scenario significantly changed. But with that social scenario, so also has the whole realm of communications changed, meaning that you're no more isolated from your family when you're in operational theatres, because the family can actually see it and live it and stream it and so on.
So they are deployed. They're sitting at home, but they're deployed; they're on standby. Every time somebody mentions somebody injured, they're reacting, all the the time. I had two of my children needing help when I got back. I came back and was nowhere near the same person I had been when I left, but the family wasn't the same either.
So I'll go to the extent of saying that if you deploy a member into an operational theatre, then you take on the responsibility for the family. So whatever deal you work out with the provinces for the member, you had better be working out a deal also for the family.