Yes, the terms are very similar. This helps guide parliamentarians, as it eliminates the debate to determine whether we are responsible and whether something should be done or not.
Facts need to be faced: the individual was deployed, affected, injured or killed. They put their life on the line and their family went through that experience. There are no options in that approach.
Of course, what is reasonable in terms of financial cost is always a consideration. That's established based on the country's mores.