Thank you, Chair.
One of my concerns that I expressed was that often—not always, but often—there could be a manifestation of injury well after the five-year period has expired. I believe the answer given to me was that benefits that would otherwise be available to that candidate would still be there, but this opportunity for employment would not be available to them.
It was among those other reasons that I honestly believe that even if there are thousands of candidates, these are men and women who were prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice. They accepted unlimited liability. Remember, they still have to qualify. Even under the best of circumstances within the five years, they still have to qualify that they should go to the head of the line.
For those two reasons, I thought it important—one, that they should be eligible to be employed, notwithstanding that they have access to the other regulatory benefits; and two, what you, I guess, can't comment on, and that is that they should have a right to that employment even if there are thousands, as Mr. Hawn has said.