I thank the parliamentary secretary for that explanation. But as you know, in every situation there are always exceptions to this. I know Mr. Hawn would know this as well. The odd time we deal with someone who's been released from the military in a particular category that he or she disagrees with and sometimes it takes years for a category to change.
For example, a person can be dishonourably discharged, when in reality it should have been a medical release for a psychiatric concern. If they're successful in getting that changed, then their official record no longer says “dishonourable”, or whatever other codes they have. They change to a 3(b) release. Sometimes that takes years, especially if it has to go to court to fight it or something of that nature. I know these are exceptions, but in that particular event, say a person's released today and then seven years later they got that release changed and now all of a sudden they're medically released, would they then be categorized as a five-year, 10-year exemption in that regard?
It's just a question I throw out. I just heard this morning from a fellow who asked about that. Otherwise, your explanation is fine. We don't have much difficulty with it. But I think Frank is right in his question, and I just wanted to know if you guys had an answer in that particular regard.