Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thanks to all of you for coming here and thank you for your service.
I have a follow-up to a question that my colleague asked about medical release, but I want to ask the question differently.
On the determination of medical release, I would assume—I don't know whether it's true or not because I'm not familiar with it—that the determination now is different from what it was for a person 50 years ago in the Canadian army who was deemed to have a medical release. The way the army has changed—the duties have changed and there's progress on the technology, etc.—probably makes it easier for people with certain injuries to keep serving if they choose to do so.
Can you comment on this? How has it changed? I've heard a Second World War story about a fighter pilot who lost both legs and eventually was able, with two artificial legs, to fly a plane on combat missions. Is there an effort made within the army so that if a person with serious injuries is determined to serve, he can serve?