Yes. I think that's a very significant issue and it goes much beyond simply mefloquine. It's the issue of a soldier's right to consent to medical treatment, and it's a challenging one. We're sending people into an area where they may be exposed to certain diseases and we have these medications. We want to protect the soldiers—we have an obligation to protect the soldiers. Are they able to make an informed consent?
I'm not the expert here, but my understanding is that if you get ordered to take that drug, you take that drug. I know that in the United States, from what Dr. Nevin was writing, frequently the drug inserts that say to stop taking it if you're getting certain reactions were not being provided to soldiers, so the information was not being provided. Even if it were being provided, were they actually empowered to say, “I have to stop taking this”? These are very challenging issues when we're dealing with a captive population that may not have the same freedom of consent to a medical treatment as any other citizen would.