Thank you.
I'll just stay on that point. It's not to be redundant, but it needs to be clear in all of our minds.
I appreciate the notion that the service medical people are interested in dealing with the facts of the case before them, not what funds may be available as a result. The file should be written up in a way that everything with regard to the service people's activity should be seamlessly transportable to the veterans' situation, and to us around the table, because we heard so many of these witness testimonies that there didn't seem to be an understanding of the service time in the post-service time.
Is there no way that the medical records could have a strong indication that didn't require months of interpretation by veterans affairs as to the attribution of the problem?