That would probably be left in the best interests of the person disclosing. One would have to ask what the benefit is to disclose this to the public. There may be some benefits for that individual to have their story well known and publicized, or it may violate the sense of privacy of that individual, and they would prefer to discuss it with someone who's been there to get that camaraderie and sense of understanding.
When I was providing that service as a chaplain, I got the sense, when I heard people wanting to tell their story or have their privacy respected, that they wanted me to see them. They wanted me to know who they were. They didn't want to be seen as some sort of object. They wanted to be seen as a person who had done this service for Canada and to be recognized for that.
The other question you asked, about making sure that people are aware of the services and benefits that they are entitled to, is, I think, a very interesting proposal. I said that I think it is a necessary and essential condition of service that people have deep security within themselves of what will happen to them if they are sent into a theatre of war and into harm's way, and what will happen to their family. That disclosure, I think from the get-go, certainly in today's less-than-stable environment, would be a critical aspect, not only after release, but also for a sense of security that this country takes a member's unlimited liability seriously enough to say that these are the benefits they would receive should they be wounded or killed.