Yes, it's very different as a concept.
We are at that point where, as we're waiting now for the work to be concluded on the standards issue, we will then look to see what they are recommending, what would be an acceptable national standard both for training of dogs, for acquisition of dogs, and so on. We'll look at that, and then, of course, the collateral point is the efficacy issue. Is this an effective therapy or an effective support to veterans with PTSD?
If the answer to that appears to be yes from the research that comes out, then obviously what we have to do—and we're already now starting to direct our minds to it—is to say, okay, what would that look like on the ground? What should Veterans Affairs programming do? Should it provide, as we do with CNIB service dogs, the vet bills and care of the service dog? Should it extend to acquisition of the service dog? There are all kinds of very complex issues that have to be looked at as the clarity emerges in terms of the standards and the efficacy.