They wouldn't have to prove that the diagnosis they have is related to their employment, because the nature of the employment has already been presumed to have caused, or has had the potential to cause, that type of injury.
Executive Director, Case Management, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (Ontario)
They wouldn't have to prove that the diagnosis they have is related to their employment, because the nature of the employment has already been presumed to have caused, or has had the potential to cause, that type of injury.
See context to find out what was said next.