Great.
There are 11 reports from Mr. Walbourne, and a number of reports from us. There are reports everywhere, but never has this been dealt with, to define who we are and why we are here. Really, that has to come from our veterans. We talk about “communicating effectively to veterans”. We actually need to hear from them, as much as possible, before we try to communicate to them.
Apparently, we are about to begin another study dealing with trying to identify the impediments to transition. I've heard a lot of those discussed already. Would we not be wiser, at this point, to find a way to come up with very concise answers to what outcomes we need to clearly define and how we are going to define outcomes for how service is provided, so that we can move on? As long as that isn't defined, it's like you say, we're shooting at the target but never reaching the bull's eye.
How do we do that? How do we come up with those outcomes?