Okay. Thank you.
I have a quick question in my remaining 30 seconds.
The Canadian, United Kingdom, and Australian governments all found that traditional programs did not meet the needs of veterans of post-world war conflicts. This led to the move to the new charter, and around the world the approach has become very different. It's similar, but different from what it used to be.
How did we come to this decision in agreement all around the world? What was it that wouldn't work well in that traditional program for our veterans of today? I know we want them to engage in society. My understanding is World War I and World War II veterans came back, got jobs, settled into communities, and married. All of these issues were as real then as they are now, so why the need to change?