First of all, I don't think we're the only ones objecting to his report, but you would have to raise the second part with the CAF, not with me. I can't speak on their behalf, because he is their ombudsman.
From our perspective, when it comes to the medical adjudication, we serve not only the serving members. The doctors at CAF can do only service attribution or determine what caused the illness of the serving members, and I don't even know if they can do that. We have a whole series of veterans out there, so you would bifurcate a system. You would have two systems, one for still-serving members and one for veterans, which, in my view, makes no sense. We are trying to get closer to our colleagues at CAF and have one process, whether it is rehab or, in this case, adjudications or finding employment, as opposed to bifurcating a system.