Dr. Heber, I'm sorry to interrupt you. I have one minute left.
I totally agree with you that there are different needs, but I believe that VAC's responsibility is to deal with the need for a psychiatric service dog, which is a very specific designation. If we were to do that, the rest is more manageable.
I have an autistic grandson who has a Lab. That meant that his mom could finally get some sleep. They couldn't afford the $30,000 version, so they got their own Lab and my son trained him. He's doing the job for what they need. I understand the breadth—the complementary versus the direct treatment—but I would say VAC's responsibility is to deal specifically with the need for psychiatric service dogs and that unique designation. That's where it can do the most good in assisting our veterans.
I'm hearing all the time that it does make a significant difference to the other types of treatments they need, for those who have it.