Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. My questions will be for Ms. Vaillancourt.
You started your opening remarks with an update from the testimony that you gave on March 12. You talked about case managers. We had this conversation on March 12, but you would agree that once a veteran has been approved for benefits, then case managers are engaged. While your members, the case managers, are important to you, they really don't have anything to do with the backlog. We're talking about disability adjudication.
I want to stay on the subject of your March 12 testimony because I found it interesting that you sought to update your testimony with respect to case managers, whose connection to the study is tenuous, but you didn't provide an update with something else you said on March 12, yet you had written to the committee to ask to update your testimony.
I'm referring to the reference you made on March 12 that it's unfortunate that disability adjudicators are based in Charlottetown. After I contacted your membership here in Charlottetown and they told you how displeased they were, you waited nine days before you wrote to this committee to ask to update your testimony.
My first question to you is: Do you have the email that you sent to the committee where you asked for your testimony to be updated?