Okay. I'm not sure I'm clear, but I'm not sure we're going to get there in the short period of time we have.
What I hope I'm not hearing is that somehow we've determined that those who served in the Persian Gulf or Afghanistan were not under an incredible level of risk. I almost feel like that's what I'm hearing, and if that's what I'm hearing, that's concerning to me, because they clearly were. Frankly, they served in wars, and I think you would probably agree with me, but I know you have to read what's on your page.
Let me ask this. I don't know if the answer will be different, but I'll ask both DND and VAC, and if it's the same answer for both, one of you can provide it, but if it's different for both, I'd like to hear from each organization.
In terms of insurance coverage for those who are injured in fighting, whether it be in a special duty area versus in what's designated as a war, is there a difference for those two types of service?