We have actually heard testimony from veterans in this study who indicated to us that their understanding of the policy is that the coverage of injuries under special duty service is, in fact, significantly less than what it would be if it's considered wartime service. Are you indicating to us that this is not accurate? Do veterans of conflicts—for example, the Persian Gulf or Afghanistan—actually get less than a Korean War veteran would get, for example?
On October 7th, 2024. See this statement in context.