Mr. Chair, I'll make my best attempt to answer this important question.
It presumes that the legislation is an issue here, which I don't think it is. The two pieces of legislation are distinct in their own right. The current legislation actually provides, from a serving CAF member's perspective, all the required authorities to our minister to actually declare a special duty service. That then clinches that a committee will look at the risk factors and the hardships, from which will derive proper compensation, benefits and recognition, so all the tools are there to properly support CAF members when deployed.
The fact that we don't use “wartime service” in the current legislation doesn't negate any level of effort, from an official's perspective, to support the members. We feel that all the tools are there to actually provide for and support our members.
I hope that helps.