Thank you, Mr. May.
It's always a fine line for veterans to recognize that, look, the public needs to be involved. At the same time, we don't want to see an abrogation of the government's responsibility to directly care for us. Yes, I think the outreach program that civilians and police officers can do.... Anything is good that they can...because they become part of the solution, right?
The education gets out there on the streets, and they become more approachable. Until Veterans Affairs builds up a better reputation within the veteran community and until Veterans Affairs gets more resources, we're going to need people like that to get veterans into the programs, so there's a recommendation. Let's hire a lot more staff. Let's increase the budget substantially for employees.
I think Veterans Affairs also has to look at what Louise has been talking about. It's just one step after what Louise says, which is that we really need, first of all, a true research department.
Veterans Affairs does do some research. A lot of it is paper research. A lot of it is done in conjunction with Statistics Canada, and they produced the last survey, which is a very valuable tool, but the information is being ignored.
The focus has always been on getting those veterans employed and getting them off the payroll. Let's get them out there and get them off case management because we have quotas to fill, right? Those are the perverse incentives that the employees are under. Instead, you know, we're not looking at the holistic part of the veteran, right? How do we make them feel like they belong to the country? How do we get communities to do outreach?
Another thing is how we care for the complex disabilities that many veterans are suffering from. The solution we've been recommending is called “shattering the stigma”. In fact, I put it in a report to the committee on April 14, 2021. You guys all have a copy of it. It has multi-part recommendations to improve all aspects of Veterans Affairs. That includes, for instance, a collaborative care model, which is an interdisciplinary team, a real one. Veterans Affairs says that they have those. It's an administrative interdisciplinary team that they have, but we need a true team of practitioners who know the client, who know that if the client is suffering from symptom X and that if a specialist can't deal with that, they have another specialist in line. That model's been working in the United States Veterans Affairs for a number of years now. It's very successful.
That brings us back to Louise's point. If Canada's not going to be doing the active scientific research.... I think this was 10 years ago, but the U.S. Veterans Affairs research department had a annual budget of $270 million U.S. We're not even spending 1% of that, to my knowledge, in Canada, so if we're not going to do our own research, then let's complete the next part of the puzzle, the other recommendation. Let's accept all presumptive conditions that the U.S. has recognized for all special duty areas. That's an easy one. Let's incorporate the research from Australia and the U.S. and have informed disability assessment decisions based on that research.
Let's have an independent team of specialists who tell Veterans Affairs about this scientific information and how to incorporate it into a disability assessment. Let's change the width. Let's hire more assessors. You guys have been railing against the backlog for years. That's an easy one, another recommendation.
If you go back to the report that I provided, you'll see that there are 53 recommendations in there. I think you'll find some very valuable ones that will address what we're talking about now.
What I would want to say is that all the thank yous are so appreciated by us here, and the words you have all said to us are very meaningful. I think the fear of every veteran is that it ends at thank you. There has to be some substantive compensation of some sort behind that, a substantive obligation to care for us. As I've said in private to some of you, some of the large focus is on just getting more money for this program that veterans have, and one reason is that it does replace a hole that's not been given by or returned by our country.
As for the reciprocity of, “We really care for you; we're going to show it to you; we're going to get you re-established; we're going to have people there for you 24 hours a day when you're in crisis”, I don't mean a 1-800 number. I'm talking about a true practitioner, a clinical care manager who's there and on call. Let's say the case manager has 30 people but can also reach out to the specialist right away to help that person, right? That's a true collaborative care model. That's what we're missing in terms of one-on-one care. The budget is the big thing we're missing overall.