Chair, I think that's a little bit of payback for last week.
Thank you for joining us today.
I'd like to thank you for your service, Corporal Sewell.
I'll point out, Mr. Boudreau, that my father was in the corrections facilities before, so I understand that it's not an easy job with what you witness. I appreciate your being open with some of the challenges you're facing today.
Right now, I'd like to just point out a comment that was made by Mr. Sewell about every other legislation that we have concerning common law. The way we look at partnership seems to be linear everywhere else except in this particular circumstance. We seem to be outdated. That is validated by the language that's used when we talk about “gold digger”, which quite honestly is not acceptable terminology to use right now. Maybe it was acceptable back in 1901.
I apologize that you're labelled that, quite honestly. I'm sorry because that seems outdated.
Mr. Gill, you're not going to get off the hook that easily. Apart from my statements, I do have a question for you, sir.
This issue was ruled on by the courts. That was nearly 30 years ago. Are you aware of any new moves to challenge this in the courts again, sir?