They're having trouble tracking who's doing what at this point in the day, I think. That's fair enough.
I just have one question for Ms. Garrett-Baird.
In regard to Statistics Canada, the data tables requested by Veterans Affairs Canada were to provide a broad and general understanding of the financial situation and occurrence of low income among spouses of veterans who entered into a new relationship at age 60 and after. I believe that you clarified that this is what was asked and provided by them to VAC.
However, according to Statistics Canada, it has never been asked by Veterans Affairs Canada to do any specific analysis on the impact of the marriage after 60 clause or the veterans survivors fund. I just wonder, in light of all the information that is needed to be able to deal with this as quickly as possible to come up with decisions around that fund, why was that the case? Why were they not asked to do that additional work?