No, the $150 million was targeted for survivors. It was not to develop the fund. As I mentioned at the outset, the research that we have undertaken we have done within our own operating funding. We have not used that $150 million because that is targeted for survivors.
I want to reiterate that the fund is not a change to the marriage after 60 clause in the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act. The focus would be on developing a fund for individuals who may be impacted by the clause.
This is not an issue where there has been a dragging of feet. We had no information, really, to understand what the needs of this population were or how many were a part of it so that we could actually determine how we would attribute this and what their actual needs were. Without any kind of information, we would be creating a very ill-informed fund, and that would not meet the needs of individuals.