Okay. I appreciate that clarification and understanding as well.
I want to go back, Mr. Ledwell, because I'm still a little unclear. In the first 45 minutes or so of the meeting, we seemed to be repeatedly hearing that there had been one incident. Then it seemed that all of a sudden, about an hour into the meeting, there was a bit of a shift in that. I'm a little unclear, and I need to understand which version is accurate. Maybe I misunderstood; I don't know, but I seemed to be hearing two different versions. All of a sudden there was an introduction that there had been actually a second individual who'd had discussions undertaken with a caseworker.
If I even understood that correctly, that individual actually had gone through with medical assistance in dying. Did I misunderstand that?