Thank you, Chair. I'm listening to the discussion. I just want some clarity. I hear what Monsieur Desilets is saying. In the third and fourth paragraphs, there's a line in brackets that says “providing for the redaction of names and personal information of veterans and VAC clients”. I was wondering if you would be comfortable with—and this is more of a compromise—moving up that bracketed section, which protects our vets, to paragraphs 1 and 2. I am just offering that as a compromise between what I've been hearing and what we're debating.
The second point I want to make is that right now we have an investigation going on and so a lot of resources are being pulled to investigate these cases, and we all want to get to a resolution. I am comfortable overall with this motion, but it's going to take time and effort away from the actual investigation happening. As a committee, we should be mindful of the resources that we're pulling from the investigation. Second, between what Monsieur Desilets is saying and what we ultimately want with this motion, I just feel we should move what's in the third and fourth paragraphs up to paragraphs 1 and 2.