I wouldn't say that there's a gold standard. As I mentioned, the U.K. has put quite a bit of effort into employment after release. They recently did a few evaluations of their program. One of them showed that they weren't providing a lot of services to probably the most vulnerable, who are those who had very few years of service in the military, because it was based more on eligibility criteria than on need.
What I would say is that, whatever strategy is put in place, it shouldn't require so many years of service in order to provide benefits. As I was saying, the younger veterans with the shorter terms of service are the most likely to be unemployed following release from the military.