Mr. Richards indicated that there may have been some misunderstanding. That's certainly borne out by the document that was produced, in which the department indicated that it had received assurance or some information from the clerk that the date limit referred to in part (b) of the motion was also applicable to part (a).
I think it's incumbent upon us to hear from the clerk as to exactly what the communication was between the clerk and the people collecting the documents. It matters to me in terms of the tone of the motion.