I'll quickly make two points.
I remember an indigenous elder at a policy conference, who said, “Everyone's doing really good here at making quilt pieces, but what I don't see is who the quiltmaker is.” I think that's what we keep finding over and over again. There are a lot of very good people doing the quilt pieces, but there's no coordination. There is duplication. There are areas that aren't being addressed.
When we do research right now, we consistently only get the women's research compared to the men, and yet by definition, again, anything that's women-specific will never come up in that format of women versus men. Women versus civilian women is still very rarely seen in our research, yet it's more interesting. However, for a lot of what we do in the military, there is no civilian equivalent. Again, a lot of this very military women-specific occupational research has to be ideally with the Five Eyes, with our allies, and working together on our numbers for things like military types of flying and submarines and things where there is no civilian equivalent. We have this opportunity in this relationship.
If it were a topic of political will and focus, we have enough women now across the other allies to come up with some real data of meaning for things that should be simple by now, such as reproductive issues in flying, or pregnancy in the military context, or being at sea and pregnant.