My recommendation is that female members have a broad idea of when they would like to start a family, and three months before they even start, they're removed from the floor.
I was at a fertility clinic with my husband...and I had to fight tooth and nail not to install PRC, which is the most damaging thing to the cell of the embryo as it's developing. By the time the stick turns blue, it's already done. I had to go to medical and fight with the doctor to get six months off the floor because I was going to be made to paint. I had to ask and sound like the squeaky wheel so I could potentially protect and do what was best for the baby. I wasn't joking; I was in fertility.
I have three children, one of whom I had before I got really exposed and two of whom had exposure. One has nothing. One has asthma and dyslexia with anxiety, and the other one has ADD with anxiety and anger.
I do not believe that I had different genetics apart from what changed in my environment. What changed in my environment was the work environment. I was put in an office, but I was still in the building. I couldn't be on the flight line. I needed to be away from possible explosions and paint jobs and away from exhaust fuel, which is carcinogenic. It was blowing toward the PMQs. Everything is going towards the children and towards the wives. It's a much bigger thing.
The Marie-Ève Doucet case should be brought to this study, and this committee should really hone in on that. There should be presumptive claims for haz-mat exposure, especially for women.