Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I thank my colleague for this subamendment.
It will probably come as no great surprise to you, Mr. Chair, that I found his reasoning to be very compelling, and I'll be supporting the subamendment, due primarily to the fact that it gives us an option or an insurance policy.
The level of detail that I think the committee deserves from the National Capital Commission doesn't lend itself well to a letter, so I think it's entirely possible that, after receiving the letter, there will be some additional questions. Maybe I'm wrong.
Ms. Blaney was absolutely within her rights to move the subamendment she did to substitute the letter. I expect the motivation behind the subamendment was one of efficiency, which is also admirable. However, with something that has taken on the character that this discussion has, it strikes me that, if we're going there, we should leave no stone unturned, and this will ensure that this happens. It gives us an option that we don't have to use if the letter is as comprehensive as we require. I'll be supporting it.