I declare Motion No. 12 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 13.
House of Commons Hansard #145 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was heritage.
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
I declare Motion No. 12 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 13.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Madam Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent to apply the vote taken on report stage Motion No. 1 to the motion now before the House and you would find further unanimous consent to apply that to report stage Motions Nos. 17, 22 and 24 as well.
René Laurin Bloc Joliette, QC
Madam Speaker, again, I think that the numbers of the motions reported by the hon. Liberal Party whip should be checked because all this is not consistent with the previous agreement.
Would it be possible to repeat the numbers of the motions being referred to?
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Madam Speaker, I would ask consent that the result applied to Motion No. 1 apply to report stage Motions Nos. 13, 17, 22 and 24.
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
Is there unanimous consent?
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
I declare Motions Nos. 13, 17, 22 and 24 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 14. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 15, 16, 18, and 19.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Madam Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to apply the vote taken on report stage Motion No. 3 to the item now before the House.
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
Is there unanimous consent?
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
[Editor's Note: See list under division No. 152.]
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
I declare Motion No. 14 lost. Consequently, Motions Nos. 15, 16, 18, and 19 are also lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 20. A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 23.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Madam Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent for the members who voted on the previous motion to be recorded as voting on the motion now before the House in the following manner: Liberal members voting nay.
Jim Silye Reform Calgary Centre, AB
Madam Speaker, the Reform Party will vote yea, except for those members who may wish to vote otherwise.
Len Taylor NDP The Battlefords—Meadow Lake, SK
Madam Speaker, New Democrats vote yea.
Jag Bhaduria Liberal Markham—Whitchurch-Stouffville, ON
Madam Speaker, I will be voting nay.
(The House divided on the motion, which was negatived on the following division:)
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
I declare Motions Nos. 20 and 23 negatived.
Diane Marleau Liberalfor the Minister of Canadian Heritage
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I think you would find unanimous consent to apply the vote just taken on report stage Motion No. 20 in reverse to the concurrence motion.
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
Does the House agree?
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Department Of Canadian Heritage ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)
I declare the motion carried.
When shall the bill be read the third time? Is there unanimous consent to read the bill the third time later this day?
Herb Gray LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons and Solicitor General of Canada
Madam Speaker, in order to comply with the order of the House made earlier this day, I am now tabling copies, in both official languages, of the report of the Security Intelligence Review Committee entitled "The Heritage Front Affair".