Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Environment.
Monday, in the House, the Deputy Prime Minister endorsed the opposition expressed by Kingston city council to the construction of a suitable French-language school, saying it was
justified because, and I quote: "The proposed site was only steps away from a dangerous toxic waste treatment site".
Does the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Environment still maintain that Kingston's opposition to the proposed French school is justified because the site already purchased by the school board is allegedly next to a site that handles toxic and hazardous wastes, when such a site does not exist? Does she still maintain that, yes or no?