Many times in the course of debate when we take words out of context they do not always have the same connotation that they ordinarily would have.
Notwithstanding the fact that the hon. member has rightly pointed out that the statement which she quotes as being used is out of order I would refer the hon. member to page 149 of Beauchesne's 6th edition, "unparliamentary language", where it says:
The Speaker has consistently ruled that language used in the House should be temperate and worthy of the place in which it is spoken. No language is, by virtue of any list, acceptable or unacceptable. A word which is parliamentary in one context may cause disorder in another context, and therefore be unparliamentary.
I would say the point has been made. I would rule that it should have been brought up probably at the instant when it occurred rather than a day later. I am hopeful the hon. member will accept it is on the record that these words are indeed unparliamentary. My ruling for now would simply be that I hope the use of these words would not occur again in the near future.
Is this on the same point of order?