We are going to be faced many times in this House in dealing with facts or the interpretation of facts which are contradictory, and we are going to engage in very vigorous debate. All of us were sent to Parliament to represent very strong opinions.
However, in the nature of Parliament itself, we must take the word of hon. members at face value.
We all have done this as a tradition. If there is an interpretation of facts that are contrary one to the other it does not serve the purpose of Parliament if we use words that are unparliamentary.
I would appeal once again to the hon. member for Richmond-Wolfe, who holds as is evident very strong opinions, to withdraw the words "que le premier ministre a menti" and use other words that would be acceptable to Parliament.
I am sure it would help a great deal not only in the course of question period but in the course of debate if we did not resort to this type of word. I would appeal to the hon. member for Richmond-Wolfe to reconsider what has been said. If he could do this, we could get on with question period.
Would the hon. member please withdraw the words "que le prime ministre a menti" and replace them perhaps with some other words?