Mr. Speaker, apart from the fact that Mr. Matthews was under oath and runs the risk of facing very serious consequences for perjury, there is the fact that the Prime Minister can no longer use Mr. LaBarge's testimony as his support, because Mr. LaBarge contradicted him-
self in the tape the Globe and Mail obtained, as it reported this morning, and this is very serious, Mr. Speaker.
So, if the Prime Minister is so sure of the truth of his words, why does he not go and repeat them under oath before the Senate committee of inquiry?