Mr. Speaker, I listened to the response given by the hon. member and I can understand his frustration with the Senate. Reform has long
proposed an equal, elected and effective Senate. It is supposed to be the House of sober second thought.
Does the member not think it is actually a good sign when the Senate does something? It has returned a bill to the House and indicated it has given consideration to it. Is that not a very important signal that the Senate is prepared to give sober second thought to something? The bill has been sent back here and the Senate has said: "Take another look at this. Is this really what you want?"
Does the member not think that is quite a good thing to happen?