Mr. Speaker, I am gad the hon. gentleman made reference to due process of law.
He will know that in the case of the litigation underway in western Canada there have been two conflicting court decisions, one earlier this spring in a case called McMechan and Cairns that went in one direction, and another decision in the Sawatzky case that went in the other direction; both decisions by the same provincial court level. That obviously creates a conundrum in terms of future interpretation. Some of those matters are at this moment under appeal.
I remind the hon. gentleman the appeal process is a part of the due process of law.