Madam Speaker, it would be most unusual if the House were to somehow try to overturn your ruling by doing what I do not understand it to be permitted to do, which is to appeal your judgment of what you heard in terms of yeas and nays.
I happen to share the view that you heard differently than I heard. But it is up to the Chair to judge what the Chair hears and to make that judgment. It puts the House in a rather difficult position, because certainly had you ruled the other way with respect to yeas and nays, opposition members would have had a chance to decide whether they wanted a recorded vote on this. Perhaps they would have risen anyway. The irony is that the government was forced by virtue of your ruling to cause a recorded vote on the very thing that it did not want a recorded vote on.
I am sure the government regards that as unfortunate but whether it is reversible or not is another matter.