Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote yes on this motion.
House of Commons Hansard #44 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was cpp.
House of Commons Hansard #44 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was cpp.
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote yes on this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members will vote yes on this motion.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, NDP members vote no on this motion.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, Conservative members are voting yes on this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 5, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 58Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 5 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 6, 13 and 14 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 7. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 9, 15 and 17.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present support the motion wholeheartedly.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members will vote yes on this motion.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, NDP members vote no on this motion.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, Conservative members will be voting no.
(The House divided on Motion No. 7, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 59Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 7 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 9, 15 and 17 lost.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to report stage Motion No. 8.
Division No. 59Government Orders
The Speaker
The question is on Motion No. 8. A vote on Motion No. 8 one way or the other will apply to Motion No. 16. Is that agreed?
Division No. 59Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 8 lost. Therefore Motion No. 16 is defeated.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yes.
Division No. 59Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there unanimous consent?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present will support this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members will vote no on this motion.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, NDP members present vote no on this motion.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, Conservative members will be voting yes.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
