Mr. Speaker, this reply does not answer the question, but the official opposition is getting used to that.
In June 1996, the Employment Insurance Commission, which is an administrative federal tribunal, recognized that Mr. Delisle's suspension had more to do with his attempt to unionize than with a violation of regulation 57.
Will the minister confirm that the real reason the government is after Mr. Delisle is because the RCMP is trying to "break" his attempts to unionize the force's members?